Skip to content

Carbon Capture, Sequestration, and Storage

Background

Carbon Capture and Sequestration/Storage is often shorted to the acronym (CCS). This can be confused with another acronym of a similar process, CCUS. CCUS stands for Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage. Both of these refer to the process of capturing carbon dioxide (CO2), when it is created during a power generating or industrial process. This carbon is then contained and stored, sometimes underground or transported via pipeline, to prevent it being emitted into the atmosphere. The main difference with CCUS is rather than storing the CO2, it can be repurposed in an industrial process such as being used for fuel.

Carbon capture is being touted as a major climate crisis solution, but the evidence is to the contrary. CCS is expected to account for approximately 2.4% of carbon mitigation in the world by 2030.[1] Additionally, industry and legislators alike are saying that current CCS operations will capture 90-95% of the CO2 emitted. This is false. CCS facilities that have been studied have either completely shut down before full operation or fallen short of their goals and the global rate of carbon capture is only averaging about 83% currently.[2] Companies and facilities make bold claims when it comes to how much CO2 they plan to capture in their production. But when it comes to actual performance of the capture rate, expectations fall woefully short. The Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage project forecasted a 22% capture rate, but reported an actual capture rate of 12%.[3]

Carbon capture will not provide reliable or safe carbon reductions. It is estimated that between 100 and 200 gigatons of CO2 will need to buried to bring us back within our carbon budget, including burying hundreds more gigatons after 2050.[4]  Even with the best currently used technology, the concern is that the carbon will eventually leak back into the atmosphere.[5]There is not a long enough record of testing carbon storage in different formations to know whether it would stay where injected underground. Sometimes caps are suggested as the solution but what technical experts do know is the likelihood of caps failing is great if there are natural fractures and/or human-made changes such as mines and oil and gas wells; a failed cap means carbon escapes.[6]

There are great risks posed by carbon capture and pollutants that will continue to be emitted even with CCUS. Groundwater and drinking water contamination could occur as carbon leaks through the geologic formation into freshwater aquifers.[7] Carbon can also migrate to the surface and leak into the atmosphere from the injection point.

If carbon escapes to the atmosphere, it can be highly dangerous. Carbon pipeline explosions can occur, uncontrollably releasing carbon into the air. This happened in Satartia, Mississippi when a carbon pipeline exploded without warning. One news story described the catastrophe: “As the carbon dioxide moved through the rural community, more than 200 people evacuated and at least 45 people were hospitalized. Cars stopped working, hobbling emergency response. People lay on the ground, shaking and unable to breathe.”[8] “The story of the pipeline rupture and its lasting effects was first reported in HuffPost in 2021 by the Climate Investigations Center. The Center obtained recordings of the 911 calls and shared them with NPR.”[9] Devastating negative health effects are still felt by residents there today according to reports from health care providers: “Carbon dioxide poisoning can also affect the brain”, says Steven Vercammen, an emergency room physician in Belgium who has studied carbon dioxide intoxication.”[10]

Carbon poisoning and asphyxiation from such an incident can occur with any carbon pipeline. As explained about the Satartia incident: “Humans always breathe some carbon dioxide, but too much causes a thirst for oxygen, disorientation and heart malfunction. Extreme exposures to carbon dioxide can lead to death by asphyxiation. The use of carbon dioxide to kill pigs in abattoirs is now under scrutiny over whether it complies with federal laws on humane slaughter. Carbon dioxide in open air can disperse. But third-party air monitoring that night in Satartia showed that potent clouds of CO2 can sometimes hang in the air for hours.”[11]


[1]Carbon Capture and Storage, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis,  https://ieefa.org/ccs, last accessed July 3, 2024.

[2] Amandine Denis-Ryan, Fact Sheet: Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) has a poor track record, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, https://ieefa.org/resources/fact-sheet-carbon-capture-and-storage-ccs-has-poor-track-record , February 8, 2024

[3] Id., pg. 6.

[4] David Roberts, Pulling CO2 out of the air and using it could be a trillion-dollar business, Vox, Nov. 2, 2019. https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2019/9/4/20829431/climate-change-carbon-capture-utilization-sequestration-ccu-ccs

[5] Terry L. Jones and Pam Radtke, A Known Risk: How Carbon Stored Underground Could Find Its Way Back Into the Atmosphere, Inside Climate News, September 26, 2023, https://insideclimatenews.org/news/26092023/a-known-risk-how-carbon-stored-underground-could-find-its-way-back-into-the-atmosphere/#:~:text=Worries%20include%20the%20potential%20for,including%20by%20the%20industry%20itself

[6] Dominic DiGiulio, Ph.D., “Understanding, Evaluating, and Remediating Leakage from Abandoned Oil and Gas Wells During Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide”, March 18, 2024. https://environmentalintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/20240318_DiGiulio_report_Final.pdf

[7] Terry L. Jones and Pam Radtke, A Known Risk: How Carbon Stored Underground Could Find Its Way Back Into the Atmosphere, Inside Climate News, September 26, 2023, https://insideclimatenews.org/news/26092023/a-known-risk-how-carbon-stored-underground-could-find-its-way-back-into-the-atmosphere/#:~:text=Worries%20include%20the%20potential%20for,including%20by%20the%20industry%20itself

[8] https://www.npr.org/2023/05/21/1172679786/carbon-capture-carbon-dioxide-pipeline

[9] Ibid.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Ibid.

Enhanced Oil Recovery

Another issue with carbon capture is that it can also be used for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), which is how the majority of captured carbon has been used to date.[12] This technique is where mature oil fields that are no longer productive through other methods, have the CO2 forcefully injected into the reservoir and force the oil up into the production well.[13] EOR is touted as a good climate solution because most of the time the CO2 injected into the ground stays there, as of now. But not always. A school had to be evacuated and relocated for several months in 2016 in Wyoming due to a CO2 leak from a nearby oil field where the company was using CO2 to force the oil out.[14] The odors of gas came from an abandoned well and it was reported that the levels of CO2 were 20 times higher than recommended.[15] The CO2 leaked through small underground cracks and rose up into the school.[16] This supports continued fossil fuel extraction at a time when we must be developing renewable energy that does not emit greenhouse gasses. Additionally, EOR allows for the dependence on fossil fuels to be perpetuated and continued the parade of false solutions.


[12] Commercial Carbon Dioxide Uses: Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery, National Energy Technology Laboratory, last accessed July 16, 2024, https://netl.doe.gov/research/coal/energy-systems/gasification/gasifipedia/eor, Section 9.2, Figure 1.

[13] Commercial Carbon Dioxide Uses: Carbon Dioxide Enhanced Oil Recovery, National Energy Technology Laboratory, last accessed July 15, 2024, https://netl.doe.gov/research/coal/energy-systems/gasification/gasifipedia/eor

[14] Cooper McKim, Wyoming School Shutter by Gas Leak Ready to Reopen, Inside Energy, May 26, 2017, https://insideenergy.org/2017/05/26/wyoming-school-shuttered-by-gas-leak-ready-to-reopen/#:~:text=Midwest%20School%20shut%20its%20doors,%2Dde%2DLis%20or%20FDL.

[15] Ibid.

[16] Ibid.